Retro Rabbit

7 formats

DevOps Retrospectives

These formats are for engineering teams that build, ship and run their own software. Together they cover the release cycle: the risks before a launch, how the release went, incidents in production, where work gets stuck, and the shortcuts that pile up as tech debt.

  • Release Retro

    45 min
    • What went smoothly
    • What broke or slipped
    • What we missed before release
    • What to change for next release

    Best for: Right after shipping a release

  • Incident Review

    60 min
    • What happened, in order
    • How we found out
    • How we responded
    • What contributed
    • Follow-ups

    Best for: Blameless reviews after an outage

  • Fishbone

    45 min
    • People
    • Process
    • Tools
    • Environment
    • Measurement

    Best for: Problems with many possible causes

  • Kanban Flow

    30 min
    • What flowed well
    • Where work got stuck
    • What waited too long
    • One change to our board

    Best for: Kanban teams without sprints

  • Tech Debt

    45 min
    • What slowed us down
    • Shortcuts we took
    • What it costs us
    • What we'll pay down next

    Best for: Engineering teams balancing speed and quality

How to choose

Think in terms of where you are in the release cycle.

  • Before a risky launch or migration. The Pre-Mortem imagines the launch has already failed and asks why. Run it a week or two before cutover, while there's still time to add a feature flag or a rollback plan.
  • Right after a release. The Release Retro covers what went smoothly, what broke or slipped, and what you missed before release. Hold it within a week, with the release notes and any incident links open.
  • After an outage. The Incident Review builds a timeline, looks at how you detected and responded, and ends with follow-ups. To dig into a single failure, follow it with the 5 Whys. When the cause is spread across tooling, process and environment, the Fishbone keeps all of them in view.
  • When delivery feels slow. Kanban Flow looks at where work waited: review queues, flaky test runs, a staging environment everyone needed at once.
  • When shortcuts catch up with you. The Tech Debt retro lists the debt the team ran into this sprint, what it costs and what to pay down next. Keep it to debt you actually hit, not the full wish list.

A rhythm that works for many teams: a Pre-Mortem before each major launch, a Release Retro after it, an Incident Review whenever production breaks, and a Tech Debt retro every few months in place of a regular one.

Turning findings into engineering work

DevOps retros produce technical follow-ups: add an alert, write a runbook, fix a flaky test, automate a manual step. They only matter if they get done.

  • Write tasks, not themes. "Alert when queue depth passes 10,000" beats "improve monitoring".
  • Give each one an owner in the Action Items panel. Retro Rabbit doesn't create tickets in your tracker, so copy the bigger items into your backlog and put the ticket number in the action item.
  • Check them first at the next retro. Open the Previous Retro and Old / Unresolved Items tabs. An incident follow-up still open three sprints later is a risk in its own right.
  • Bring your own numbers. Retro Rabbit doesn't track deploy frequency, failure rates or recovery times. If you watch them, bring them to the meeting.

On Pro AI (and during the free trial), CarrotIQ Suggest proposes action items from the top-voted notes, a quick first draft for your follow-ups. See retrospective action items that actually get done for how to keep the list short.

Frequently asked questions

What is a DevOps retrospective?

A retrospective focused on how the team builds, ships and runs software: releases, incidents, delivery flow and tech debt, rather than teamwork in general. The board and voting are the same; the columns point at the pipeline.

How is a release retro different from an incident review?

A release retro looks at a planned event, including what went well. An incident review looks at an unplanned failure in detail, with a timeline and follow-ups. If a release caused an incident, run the incident review first.

How often should we run a tech debt retro?

Every few months is enough for most teams, or sooner when people keep saying the same part of the code slows them down. Agree on one item to pay down in the next sprint.

More formats by goal

Try any of these with your team

Your team adds notes during the sprint, CarrotIQ groups and summarizes them and suggests action items, and unfinished items carry into the next retro.

14-day free trial ยท No credit card